When constructing the mirrored surfaces for telescopes, I've read of the painstaking efforts involved in producing the glass to exacting dimensions/surface roughness, and then depositing the reflective coating on the surface. Manufacturer's are at/near the limits on the size of glass that can be produced, resulting in some other approaches used to work around the limitations...such at the telescope that uses multiple hexagonal mirrors (name?) instead of a single large mirror.
My question is (and it's probably obvious, but I'm not seeing it), why must glass be used as the substrate? Could not many other materials be used (which don't have the manufacturing limitions that glass possesses), and then the surface mirrored? I would think telescopes of huge appatures could be produced, without the tremendous time and expense of working with glass. Again, I'm sure I'm missing the obvious reason(s) that's not done! I appreciate your time for reading/responding!

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

 

logo Telescopes Using Mirrors   Glass Appears To Be Always Used?
1910 10 01 ROTATING LIQUID MIRRORS FOR TELESCOPES
1910 10 01 ROTATING LIQUID MIRRORS FOR TELESCOPES
Paypal   US $2.95
Lens Grinding Mirrors Astronomical Telescopes Silvering
Lens Grinding Mirrors Astronomical Telescopes Silvering
Paypal   US $4.00
The Universe in a Mirror The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visiona
The Universe in a Mirror The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visiona
Paypal   US $1.00
Meade newtonian Reflector dust cap for 114mm or 45 mirror diameter telescopes
Meade newtonian Reflector dust cap for 114mm or 45 mirror diameter telescopes
Paypal   US $2.95
T2 T mount Mirror Telephoto Lens Telescope to Canon EOS EF DSLR Camera Adapter
T2 T mount Mirror Telephoto Lens Telescope to Canon EOS EF DSLR Camera Adapter
Paypal   US $2.99
25 Edmund telescope newtonian mirror blem coating
25 Edmund telescope newtonian mirror blem coating
Paypal   US $2.95